USPTO serial 73586910
VOLLTEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O LEAR, JANICE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VOLLTEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
BOUCHERVILLE, QUEBEC, CA
BOUCHERVILLE, QUEBEC, CA
SCARBOROUGH, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD J. PARR
RICHARD J PARR ROGERS, BERESKIN & PARRSCOTIA PLZ 40 KING ST WSTE 4000 BOX 401TORONTO, ON M5H 3Y2Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | KITCHEN CONTAINERS, NAMELY KITCHEN WRAP DISPENSERS, PAPER TOWEL DISPENSERS, KITCHEN CANNISTERS, KNIFE HOLDERS, POT LID HOLDERS AND SPICE RACKS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 1991 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 5, 1991 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 5, 1991 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 9, 1990 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 27, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 26, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 20, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 1989 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 16, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |