USPTO serial 73586951
DEEP SPRING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DEEP SPRING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
BEECHAM (AUSTRALIA) PTY. LIMITED
MOORABBIN, VICTORIA, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
H. JOHN CAMPAIGN
H JOHN CAMPAIGN GRAHAM, CAMPAIGN & MCCARTHY36 W 44TH STNEW YORK, NY 10036-8178UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | FRUIT JUICE FLAVORED MINERAL WATERS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 1989 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 13, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 1986 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 15, 1986 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 1986 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 18, 1986 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 21, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |