USPTO serial 73587601
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
MONTREAL, QUEBEC, CA
MONTREAL, QUEBEC, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
A. YATES DOWELL, JR.
A YATES DOWELL JR DOWELL & DOWELLSTE 7052001 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYARLINGTON, VA 22202| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | MULTI DESTINATION SATELLITE TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 1989 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 24, 1989 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 24, 1989 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 24, 1989 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 27, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 30, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 26, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 26, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 22, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 16, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |