USPTO serial 73587696
THE AMERICAN BOARD OF OPHTHALMOLOGY 1916 EX OBSCURIS LUX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 18, 1987
- Examiner
- OMELKO, NANCY LOU
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with THE AMERICAN BOARD OF OPHTHALMOLOGY 1916 EX OBSCURIS LUX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
AMERICAN BOARD OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
BALA CYNWYD, PA, US
AMERICAN BOARD OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
BALA CYNWYD, PA, US
AMERICAN BOARD OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
Doylestown, PA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elizabeth C. Buckingham
Elizabeth C. Buckingham Dorsey &Whitney LLP50 South Sixth StreetSuite 1500Minneapolis, MN 55402-1498Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | ADMINISTERING COMPETENCY TESTS FOR PERSONS IN THE OPHTHALMOLOGY FIELD, WHICH INCLUDES THE FIELDS OF OPTICS, REFRACTION AND VISUAL PHYSIOLOGY, NEURO-OPHTHALMOLOGY AND ORBIT, BINOCULAR VISION AND OCULAR MOTILITY, AND MEDICINE, SURGERY AND PATHOLOGY RELATING TO THE EXTERNAL, ANTERIOR AND POSTERIOR SEGMENTS OF THE EYE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AMERICAN BOARD OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
- Other trademarks owned by AMERICAN BOARD OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
- Other trademarks owned by AMERICAN BOARD OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named THE AMERICAN BOARD OF OPHTHALMOLOGY 1916 EX OBSCURIS LUX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2019 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2019 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 22, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2017 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 25, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 25, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 18, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 10, 2007 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 22, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 1993 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 27, 1993 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Aug 12, 1993 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Jul 29, 1993 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| Apr 14, 1993 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 26, 1991 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 5, 1991 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Mar 18, 1991 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Jan 28, 1991 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Dec 29, 1990 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Oct 22, 1990 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 1987 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 26, 1987 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 25, 1987 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 18, 1987 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 14, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 3, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |