Drawing for SHOCK SHIELD

USPTO serial 73587731

SHOCK SHIELD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1453715Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 18, 1987
Examiner
KURZBARD, MYRA K.
Law office
FILE DESTROYED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SHOCK SHIELD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JAMES E. BRUNTON

JAMES E BRUNTON225 W BROADWAYSTE 500GLENDALE, CA 91204

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009GROUND FAULT CIRCUIT INTERRUPTERSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDMar 7, 1986

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 27, 1992CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 27, 1992C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Nov 27, 1991CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Jun 20, 1988PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 18, 1987R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Jun 12, 1987CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Jun 4, 1987CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 27, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 28, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 20, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance