USPTO serial 73587754
MITEK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SZOKE, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MITEK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
V. BRYAN MEDLOCK, JR.
V BRYAN MEDLOCK JR RICHARDS, HARRIS, MEDLOCK & ANDREWS4500 RENAISSANCE TWR1201 ELM STDALLAS, TX 75270-2197Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE, NAMELY, INTERFACE UNITS FOR INTERFACING SMALL COMPUTERS, WORK STATIONS, AND LOCAL AREA NETWORKS (LAN) WITH LARGE COMPUTER MAINFRAMES | ABANDONED | Apr 29, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 1989 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 25, 1989 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 17, 1989 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 19, 1988 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 3, 1988 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 18, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 3, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |