CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for OUTRAGE

USPTO serial 73588607

OUTRAGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1722030Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 6, 1992
Examiner
RUPP, TERRY
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OUTRAGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ARTHUR S GARRETT

JOHN CLARKE HOLMAN JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLC400 7TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025CLOTHES FOR MEN, WOMEN AND CHILDREN; NAMELY, SUITS, DRESSES, SHIRTS AND CHEMISES, BLOUSES, SKIRTS, COATS, TROUSERS, SHORTS, VESTS, SWEATERS, CARDIGANS, SOCKS AND STOCKINGS, HATS, SCARFS, TIES, RAINCOATS, OVERCOATS, ARTICLES OF SPORTSWEAR; NAMELY, JUMPSUITS, UNDERSHIRTS, PANTS, SHORTS, JACKETS, BATHING SUITSSECTION 18 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 5, 2005C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Apr 5, 2005CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 18, 2005CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Oct 28, 2003PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 30, 2002RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Sep 30, 200289AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jul 12, 200289AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
Jul 12, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 19988.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Aug 10, 19988.AFREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED—
May 21, 1998XXXXPOST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION—
May 7, 1993COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Mar 5, 1993RRPRRESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION—
Feb 3, 1993PRAMPOST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7—
Nov 16, 1992AMD7SEC 7 REQUEST FILED—
Oct 6, 1992R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 14, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 12, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 11, 1991CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 2, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 28, 1990CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 21, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 17, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 18, 1990JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 21, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 1987JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 7, 1987EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 8, 1987CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 7, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 8, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance