USPTO serial 73588679
PRONTO BUSINESS BANKER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ERSKINE KATHRYN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRONTO BUSINESS BANKER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD WHITING
ARNOLD B DOMPIERI DAVIS HOXIE FAITHFULL & HAPGOODSTE 6032001 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYARLINGTON, VA 22202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES--NAMELY, ACCOUNT STATUS AND TRANSACTION INQUIRY, FUNDS TRANSFER, AND ACCOUNT BALANCING SERVICES | ABANDONED | May 1, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 1988 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jan 13, 1988 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 1987 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 29, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 1987 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 14, 1987 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 27, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 1987 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 1987 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 28, 1987 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 29, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 1986 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 20, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 1986 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 15, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |