USPTO serial 73589453
CRATEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CRATEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DEBORAH L. BENSON
DEBORAH L BENSON MORSE, ALTMAN & DACEYSTE 5F85 E INDIA ROWBOSTON, MA 02110Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | TOTE BAGS, BACKPACKS, HANDBAGS, PURSE, BRIEFCASES, WALLETS, KEY CASES, CREDIT CARD CASES, CHECKBOOK CASES, EYEGLASS CASES, COSMETIC BAGS, BEACH BAGS, SHOPPING BAGS, SCHOOL BAGS, BAGS FOR SPORTING EQUIPMENT, BAGS FOR CAMPERS/CLIMBERS, LUGGAGE, UMBRELLA | ABANDONED | Feb 8, 1986 |
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, MEN'S, WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S SPORTS AND DRESS WEAR, NAMELY, COATS, JACKETS, HATS, PONCHO, RAINSLICKERS, BELTS, BOOTS, SOCKS, SHOES, SCARFS, GLOVES, SWEATERS, PANTS, SHIRTS, SKIRTS, DRESSES, ATHLETIC AND RUNNING CLOTHING, NAMELY, JOGGING SUITS, SHORTS, SKIWEAR, DANCE/AEROBIC WEAR, NAMELY, LEOTARDS, SWIMSUITS, TENNIS/BASKETBALL SNEAKERS, RUNNING SHOES | ABANDONED | Oct 30, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 1990 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 9, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 1989 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 22, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 28, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |