Drawing for STEAM POWER

USPTO serial 73589491

STEAM POWER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BYERS, KRISTEN S.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STEAM POWER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GREGG I. ANDERSON

GREGG I ANDERSON HOLLAND & HARTP O BOX 8749DENVER, CO 80201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003CLEANING CONCENTRATES FOR USE IN THE CLEANING OF CARPETSABANDONEDFeb 2, 1977

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 6, 1988EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 20, 1988EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 10, 1988ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 2, 1988CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 5, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 28, 1987EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 26, 1987CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 12, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 26, 1986CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 15, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 27, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance