USPTO serial 73589560
STEAM POWER DIRTY CARPETS CLEAN CARPETS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WISEMAN, MICHELLE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STEAM POWER DIRTY CARPETS CLEAN CARPETS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GREGG I. ANDERSON
GREGG I ANDERSON HOLLAND & HART555 SEVENTEENTH STSTE 2900, POST OFFICE BOX 8749DENVER, CO 80201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | CLEANING CONCENTRATES FOR USE IN THE CLEANING OF CARPETS | ABANDONED | Feb 2, 1977 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 1988 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 15, 1988 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 15, 1988 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 18, 1988 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 1988 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 13, 1987 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 1987 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 26, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 15, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |