Drawing for DIAMOND SPRINGS

USPTO serial 73590129

DIAMOND SPRINGS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIAMOND SPRINGS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JIM ZEGEER

STE 108801 N PITT STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032BOTTLED NON-MINERAL DRINKING WATERABANDONEDMar 20, 1979

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 2, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 17, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 16, 1988EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 17, 1988ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 17, 1988EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 6, 1988CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Feb 23, 1988JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 30, 1987CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Nov 5, 1987JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 5, 1987EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 14, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 31, 1987CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 8, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 18, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance