USPTO serial 73590511
MINDBANK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ERSKINE KATHRYN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MINDBANK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
PITTSBURGH, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN M. ADAMS
JOHN M ADAMS BUCHANAN INGERSOLL PROFESSIONAL CORP57TH FL600 GRANT STPITTSBURGH, PA 15219Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PRERECORDED VIDEODISCS; PRERECORDED AUDIO AND VIDEO TAPES; AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND USER MANUALS SOLD THEREWITH; INTERACTIVE TRAINING SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF PRERECORDED VIDEODISCS, PRERECORDED VIDEO AND AUDIO TAPES, TEXTBOOKS, GRAPHIC DISPLAY UNITS AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS | ABANDONED | Apr 22, 1983 |
| 016 | TEXTBOOKS AND MANUALS TO DEMONSTRATE THE OPERATION OF COMPUTERS IN INTERACTIVE EDUCATIONAL INSTRUCTION | ABANDONED | Apr 22, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 1988 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 26, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 15, 1987 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |