USPTO serial 73590545
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD W. YOUNG
RICHARD W YOUNG KIRKLAND & ELLIS200 E RANDOLPH DRSTE 5900CHICAGO, IL 60601| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | CANDLES | ABANDONED | Dec 2, 1985 |
| 016 | PAPER BAGS; PAPER PARTY DECORATIONS; AND STATIONERY ITEMS - NAMELY, PENS, PENCILS, PENCIL BOXES AND SHARPENERS, ERASERS, CLIPS, RULERS, MEMO PADS, STICKERS, VINYL AND LEATHER NOTEBOOKS AND ORGANIZERS, ADDRESS BOOKS AND PAPERWEIGHTS | ABANDONED | Dec 2, 1985 |
| 020 | PICTURE FRAMES AND NON-METALLIC BASKETS | ABANDONED | Dec 17, 1985 |
| 028 | PORCELAIN AND FABRIC DOLLS; PLUSH TOY ANIMALS; SOFT SCULPTURE TOYS; INFLATABLE RUBBER TOYS, AND PAPER AND CERAMIC MASKS | ABANDONED | Dec 2, 1985 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 1991 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 1989 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 15, 1989 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 4, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 4, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 23, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 16, 1987 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 16, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |