USPTO serial 73590909
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SHERMAN OAKS, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOEL ROSENBLUM
16130 VENTURA BLVDSTE 610ENCINO, CA 91436| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | SHAVING OIL TO BE APPLIED TO A RAZOR BLADE FOR SHAVING FACIAL OR BODY HAIR | ABANDONED | Mar 21, 1986 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 1987 | MSNI | MISPLACED SN INQUIRY | — |
| Jun 30, 1987 | MSNI | MISPLACED SN INQUIRY | — |
| Aug 25, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |