Drawing for CASINO POKER

USPTO serial 73590921

CASINO POKER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1440337Status 900
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 19, 1987
Examiner
—
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CASINO POKER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RALPH W. KALISH, JR.

RALPH W KALISH JR KALISH & GILSTER500 N BROADWAY STE 1200ST LOUIS, MO 63102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028COMPUTER GAME PROGRAM RECORDED ON DISKETTE AND THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR IT SOLD AS A UNIT FOR PLAYING A CARD GAMEEXPIREDMar 8, 1986

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 23, 2008CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Oct 24, 2006CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 3, 1993PRA8POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8—
Feb 18, 19938.AFREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED—
May 19, 1987R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Mar 12, 1987CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Mar 11, 1987CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 5, 1987CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 3, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 4, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance