Drawing for LIGNE VERTE

USPTO serial 73591580

LIGNE VERTE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MANDIR, FREDERICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIGNE VERTE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

NEIL F. GREENBLUM

NEIL F GREENBLUM SANDLER & GREENBLUM2920 S GLEBE RDARLINGTON, VA 22206UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003TOILET SOAPSABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 23, 1990ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 30, 1989EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 30, 1989EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 24, 1989CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Feb 8, 1989EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 5, 1989CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 20, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 20, 1988CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 23, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 23, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 7, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 6, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 4, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 4, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 8, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 1986NAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED—
Jun 11, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 4, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance