Drawing for ADVANTAGE ONEIDAVALLEY NATIONAL BANK

USPTO serial 73591624

ADVANTAGE ONEIDAVALLEY NATIONAL BANK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HANNON, MARY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ADVANTAGE ONEIDAVALLEY NATIONAL BANK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

L. S. VAN LANDINGHAM, JR.

L S VAN LANDINGHAM JRSTE 5072001 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYARLINGTON, VA 22202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036AUTOMATED TELLER BANKING SERVICESABANDONEDFeb 25, 1986

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 30, 1987ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 5, 1987CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 2, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 1, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 2, 1987CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 15, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 15, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 19, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 12, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance