USPTO serial 73592586
CAPRICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CAPRICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH A. DEGRANDI
JOSEPH A DEGRANDI BEVERIDGE, DEGRANDI AND WEILACHERFEDERAL BAR BLDG WSTE 1100, 1819 H ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | FRESH FRUITS | ABANDONED | Feb 2, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 1988 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 20, 1988 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 20, 1988 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 21, 1988 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 1987 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 1987 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 24, 1987 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 25, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 29, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |