Drawing for BOURBON STREET BURGER

USPTO serial 73592616

BOURBON STREET BURGER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BOURBON STREET BURGER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

E. HARRISON GILBERT, III

E HARRISON GILBERT III LANEY, DOUGHERTY, HESSIN, CLARO, ET ALSTE 900101 PARK AVEOKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73102

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030FOOD ITEM, NAMELY A SANDWICH, FOR CONSUMPTION ON OR OFF THE PREMISESABANDONEDFeb 5, 1985

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 24, 1987ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 27, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 28, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 1987ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 9, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 9, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 9, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 9, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 9, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 11, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance