USPTO serial 73593737
ADVANCED INSTITUTIONAL MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SZOKE, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ADVANCED INSTITUTIONAL MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANITA K. YEUNG
ANITA K YEUNG BLUM, KAPLAN, FRIEDMAN, SILBERMAN, ET AL1120 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | DESIGN OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE | ABANDONED | Sep 5, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 1987 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 16, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 1987 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 19, 1987 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |