USPTO serial 73595363
BRUNCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BRUNCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
OLIVER EDWARDS, ESQ.
OLIVER EDWARDS ESQ HAIGHT, GARDNER, POOR & HAVENS195 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10007UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | DIETETIC NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS AND SLIMMING AGENTS CHIEFLY MADE FROM YOGURT POWDER AND PLANT FIBERS | ABANDONED | — |
| 029 | FOODSTUFFS FOR USE AS MEAL REPLACEMENTS, CHIEFLY CONSISTING OF EDIBLE FATS, YOGURT POWDER, CARBOHYDRATES, PROTEINS AND PLANT FIBERS; YOGURT AND YOGURT BASED MAIN ENTREES | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | YOGURT POWDER BASED DESSERT MIXES, CONSISTING CHIEFLY OF YOGURT POWDER, EDIBLE FATS, CARBOHYDRATES AND PLANT FIBERS, TO BE CHILLED PRIOR TO SERVING | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 15, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |