USPTO serial 73595411
MULTI TECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHAW, THOMAS V
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MULTI TECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NEIL A. SMITH
NEIL A SMITH HOWARD RICE NEMEROVSKI CANADY ET ALTHREE EMBARCADERO CTR 7TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | VIDEO CASSETTE RECORDERS; VIDEO TAPE PLAYERS; COMPACT AUDIO DISK PLAYERS; TELEVISION RECEIVERS; AUDIO AMPLIFIERS; AUDIO CASSETTE RECORDERS AND PLAYERS; RADIOS; COMBINATION RADIO, RECORDER AND PLAYER; COMBINATION RADIO, CASSETTE RECORDER-PLAYER, PHONOGRAPH AND SPEAKERS; AND COMBINATION TV AND RADIO | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2004 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 1987 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 28, 1987 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 27, 1987 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 11, 1986 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 26, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |