USPTO serial 73595450
URATYRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 16, 1988
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with URATYRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
WYTHENSHAWE, MANCHESTER, GB
WYTHENSHAWE, MANCHESTER, GB
WYTHENSHAWE, MANCHESTER, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
B. PARKER LIVINGSTON, JR.
B PARKER LIVINGSTON JR POPHAM HAIK SCHNOBRICH & KAUFMAN655 15TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | MACHINE PARTS, NAMELY, RESILIENT COUPLINGS; ELASTOMERIC ELEMENTS JOINING TWO METAL FLANGES MOUNTED ON TWO GENERALLY CO-AXIAL ROTATABLE SHAFTS; AND PARTS AND FITTINGS FOR THE AFORESAID GOODS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RENOLD PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by RENOLD PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by RENOLD PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named URATYRE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2009 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 4, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 1994 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 7, 1993 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 1988 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 24, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 22, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 27, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 21, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 5, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 1987 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 1987 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 6, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |