USPTO serial 73595481
FLOR-DRI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANDIR, FREDERICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLOR-DRI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BERKELEY SPRINGS, WV
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL J. MACDERMOTT
MICHAEL J MACDERMOTT HARRIS, KERN, WALLEN & TINSLEYQUINBY BLDG TOP FL650 S GRAND AVELOS ANGELES, CA 90017Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | ALL PURPOSE ABSORBENT FOR APPLICATION TO FLOORS AND OTHER SURFACES | ABANDONED | Dec 11, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 1988 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 24, 1988 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 18, 1988 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 25, 1987 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 1987 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 24, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 17, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |