Drawing for Serial No. 73595494

USPTO serial 73595494

Serial No. 73595494

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GLYNN, GERALD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 73595494?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ALLEN D. BRUFSKY

ALLEN D BRUFSKY KRAMER AND BRUFSKYP O BOX 59SOUTHPORT, CT 06490UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009INTERCHANGEABLE RECHARGEABLE ELECTRICAL BATTERY PACKS AND BATTERIES, BATTERY CHARGERS, AC POWER SUPPLIES, BATTERY EVALUATION UNITS, BATTERY DISCHARGE EQUALIZERS, POWER CABLES, BATTERY HOLDERS AND MOUNTING BRACKETS, CAMERA CONTROL UNITS FOR USE IN THE VIDEO INDUSTRYABANDONEDDec 20, 1982
011PORTABLE LIGHTS AND LIGHT FILTER ASSEMBLIESABANDONEDNov 7, 1984

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 14, 1988ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 13, 1988EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 19, 1988EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 16, 1987CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Mar 12, 1987CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 17, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 9, 1987CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 13, 1987CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 9, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 15, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 1, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 1986CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 11, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 23, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance