USPTO serial 73595733
EXQUISITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EXQUISITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ALLAN M. LOWE
ALLAN M LOWE LOWE, PRICE, LEBLANC, BECKER & SHUR427 N LEE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S SHOES | ABANDONED | Apr 20, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 1989 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 23, 1989 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 5, 1989 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 12, 1988 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 10, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 8, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 27, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 1987 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 22, 1987 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 1, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 1987 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 3, 1987 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 5, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |