USPTO serial 73595757
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D. PETER HOCHBERG
D PETER HOCHBERG1510 OHIO SAVINGS PLZCLEVELAND, OH 44114UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | ARRANGING FOR THE EXCHANGE OF OCCUPANCY RIGHTS BETWEEN OWNERS OF RESORT PROPERTIES | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 1987 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 16, 1987 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 24, 1987 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 11, 1987 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 31, 1987 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 28, 1987 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 12, 1987 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 20, 1987 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 1986 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |