USPTO serial 73596622
TESTING COMMUNICATIONS OF THE FUTURE TODAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SZOKE, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TESTING COMMUNICATIONS OF THE FUTURE TODAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CALABASAS, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JILL R. SARNOFF
JILL R SARNOFF BLAKELY, SOKOLOFF, TAYLOR & ZAFMAN9601 WILSHIRE BLVDSTE 244BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | DATA COMMUNICATIONS AND TELECOMMUNICATION TEST AND DEVELOPMENT EQUIPMENT - NAMEL COMPUTER TERMINALS, KEYBOARDS, VIDEO ANAND LED DISPLAY MONITORS, COMPUTER PROGRAMSAND USER MANUALS SUPPLIED THEREWITH, PROTOCOL TEST APARATUS, DIGITAL SWITCH TEST APPARATUS, PROTOCOL SIMULATOR ANALYZER APARATUS AND DATA STORAGE UNITS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 1987 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 13, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |