Drawing for ACCUGLIDE

USPTO serial 73596860

ACCUGLIDE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
COLE RICHARD G
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ACCUGLIDE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

FREDERICK M. WOODRUFF

FREDERICK M WOODRUFF GRAVELY, LIEDER & WOODRUFF705 OLIVE STST LOUIS, MO 63101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007ROLLER CONVEYORS-NAMELY, CONVEYORS HAVING ARTICLE SUPPORTING ROLLERS SELECTIVELY OPERATED BY A POWERED DRIVE FOR TRANSPORTING AND ACCUMULATING ARTICLESABANDONEDJun 5, 1985

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 29, 1988ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION
Apr 21, 1987PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 21, 1987NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 3, 1987CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 5, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 4, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance