USPTO serial 73597232
TROPIFRUT MANGO NECTAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TROPIFRUT MANGO NECTAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | FRUIT JUICES AND FRUIT NECTAR | ABANDONED | Jun 1, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 1989 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 19, 1989 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 16, 1989 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 1, 1988 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 8, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 12, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 6, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 8, 1987 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 16, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 18, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |