Drawing for ROTHSCHILD

USPTO serial 73597489

ROTHSCHILD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1457807Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 15, 1987
Examiner
Law office
FILE DESTROYED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROTHSCHILD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011ELECTRIC LAMPSSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDMay 31, 1985
021COOKWARE, NAMELY-- TRIVETS, COPPER MOLDS, COPPER BURNER COVERS, MIXING BOWLS, ROASTERS, SPAGHETTI COOKING POTS, CANNISTERS, SALT AND PEPPER SHAKERS, DRINKING GLASSESSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDMay 31, 1985

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 10, 1989C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL
Dec 9, 1988C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED
Sep 15, 1987R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Jul 27, 1987CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER
Jun 2, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 13, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 1, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 15, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance