USPTO serial 73598488
SANTIAGO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARSH, SHARON
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SANTIAGO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 034 | CIGARS | ABANDONED | Oct 24, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 1989 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 2, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 1988 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 16, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 1987 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 12, 1987 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 12, 1987 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 14, 1986 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 14, 1986 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 24, 1986 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |