USPTO serial 73599126
MAGNUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 27, 1990
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MAGNUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
BEDFORD MK42 9RD, GB
WARNER ELECTRIC TECHNOLOGY LLC
RICHMOND, VA
BEDFORD, GB
BEDFORD, GB
BEDFORD, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William F. Kolakowski III
WILLIAM F KOLAKOWSKI III DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC39577 WOODWARD AVE STE 300BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | AIR-APPLIED FRICTION DISC BRAKE UNITS AND PARTS THEREFOR USED FOR INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DANA INTERLOCK LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by WARNER ELECTRIC TECHNOLOGY LLC
- Other trademarks owned by T I INTERLOCK LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by T I INTERLOCK LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by T I INTERLOCK LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named MAGNUM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2010 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 2, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 2, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Jun 20, 2000 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 1996 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 30, 1996 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Nov 27, 1990 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 4, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 9, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 6, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 14, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 5, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |