USPTO serial 73602844
I & I
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRUCE, MARY FRANCES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with I & I?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PHOTOGRAPHIC APPARATUS-NAMELY, STILL CAMERAS; PHOTOFINISHING EQUIPMENT-NAMELY, SYSTEM SPLICERS, INFRARED INSPECTORS, CONTINUOUS COLOR FILM PROCESSORS, NOTCHER-PUNCHERS, AUTOMATIC COLOR PRINTERS, AUTOMATIC DENSITY CORRECTORS, AUTOMATIC COLOR ANALYZERS, COLOR ROLL PRINTERS, RECORDER UNITS, COLOR ROLL PAPER PROCESSORS, COLOR PAPER DEVELOPER REGENERATING UNITS, PAPER CUTTERS, COLLATING SORTERS, COLOR ENLARGERS, DENSITOMETERS, QUALITY CONTROL UNITS AND BILLING UNITS; PROCESSORS FOR X-RAY FILM; PROCESSORS FOR GRAPHIC ARTS FILM; MICROFILM EQUIPMENT, NAMELY-MICROFICHE-CAMERA PROCESSORS, DOWMENT FEEDERS, MICROFICHE READERS, MICROFILM CAMERAS MICROFILM AUTO-PROCESSORS, MICROFILM PRINTERS, MICROFILM INSPECTORS AND MICROFILM READERS; MOVIE CAMERAS AND MOVIE PROJECTORS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 1988 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 2, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 1986 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |