USPTO serial 73604757
AMERICAN LIVING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AMERICAN LIVING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LINDA L. BERKOWITZ
LINDA L BERKOWITZ LADAS & PARRY26 W 61ST STNEW YORK, NY 10023UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | MAGAZINE THE SUBJECT MATTER OF WHICH ARE FOOD RECIPES AND IDEAS FOR SERVING THE SAME; CRAFT PATTERNS AND DESIGNS; GIFT SUGGESTIONS; HOME DECORATING IDEAS; FASHION AND BEAUTY SUGGESTIONS; LIVING STYLES, NAMELY, HEALTH TIPS, ADVICE ON FAMILY MATTERS; BUDGET ADVICE; NUTRITION ASSESSEMENT; HOME IMPROVEMENTS; ADVICE ON HOME HARDWARE AND EQUIPMENT | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 9, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 8, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |