USPTO serial 73606306
DURACOOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 13, 1988
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DURACOOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
NEW PROVIDENCE, NJ
NAPERVILLE, IL
NAPERVILLE, IL
NAPERVILLE, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT A. MILLER
ROBERT A MILLER NALCO CHEMICAL COMPANYONE NALCO CTRNAPERVILLE, IL 60563-1198UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | METALWORKING LUBRICANTS AND METALWORKING FLUIDS FOR INDUSTRIAL USE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 24, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OAKITE PRODUCTS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by NALCO CHEMICAL COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by NALCO CHEMICAL COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by NALCO CHEMICAL COMPANY
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Similar marks named DURACOOL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2009 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 14, 1995 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 7, 1994 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 1988 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 20, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 20, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 29, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 2, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 12, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 22, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |