Drawing for DENSO DISTRIBUTORS

USPTO serial 73607022

DENSO DISTRIBUTORS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STINE, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DENSO DISTRIBUTORS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MANNY D. POKOTILOW

MANNY D POKOTILOW CAESAR, RIVISE, BERNSTEIN & COHEN LTDSTE 800 STEPHEN GIRARD BLDG21 S 12TH STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19107

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042DISTRIBUTORSHIP SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF AUTOMOTIVE PARTSABANDONEDMay 1, 1982

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 15, 1988ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 31, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 1988CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 31, 1988REINREINSTATED—
Jun 27, 1988PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 1988ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 19, 1987CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 23, 1987CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 25, 1987CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 29, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 20, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 11, 1986NAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED—
Sep 24, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 5, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance