USPTO serial 73607022
DENSO DISTRIBUTORS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DENSO DISTRIBUTORS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PHILADELPHIA, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MANNY D. POKOTILOW
MANNY D POKOTILOW CAESAR, RIVISE, BERNSTEIN & COHEN LTDSTE 800 STEPHEN GIRARD BLDG21 S 12TH STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19107Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | DISTRIBUTORSHIP SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF AUTOMOTIVE PARTS | ABANDONED | May 1, 1982 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 1988 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 1988 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 27, 1988 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 1988 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 19, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 1986 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |