USPTO serial 73607075
THE SIMPLICITY PLAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE SIMPLICITY PLAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
C. EMMETT PUGH
C EMMETT PUGH NATIONAL LAW OFFICE OF PUGH/ASSOCIATESPATENT AND TRADEMARK ATTYS LTD757 ST CHARLES AVE STE 204NEW ORLEANS, LA 70130Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | PROVIDING ARRANGMENTS FOR PRE-ARRANGED PAYMENT OF FUNERAL EXPENSES-SIMILAR TO THAT SUGGESTED BY THE EXAMINER | ABANDONED | Oct 1, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 1989 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 6, 1989 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 6, 1989 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 5, 1989 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 5, 1989 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Dec 29, 1988 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 21, 1988 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 1988 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 8, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 20, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |