USPTO serial 73607128
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JIM GIPPLE
JIM GIPPLE GIPPLE & HALEPOST OFFICE BOX 40513WASHINGTON, DC 20016UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SAFETY PRODUCTS AND SECURITY HARDWARE, NAMELY, BURGLAR ALARMS, WINDOW ALARMS, ELECTRONIC MOTION DETECTORS, AUTOMATIC ON/OFF ELECTRICAL CONTROLS WITH TIMER OR LIGHT-SENSOR CONTROLS | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 1988 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 15, 1988 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 18, 1988 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 8, 1987 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 7, 1987 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 8, 1987 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 6, 1987 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 28, 1987 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |