USPTO serial 73607527
MCGRAW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MCGRAW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM G. MACKAY
WILLIAM G MACKAY155 MONTGOMERY STSTE 408SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | SPORTING GOODS, NAMELY, BASEBALLS, BASKETBALLS, FOOTBALLS, SOCCER BALLS, SOFTBALLS, VOLLEYBALLS, NEEDLE INFLATING SPORT BALLS, INFLATING NEEDLES, BASEBALL GLOVES, BOXING GLOVES, BASKETBALL NETS, VOLLEYBALL NETS, BALL PUMPS, SHIN GUARDS, KNEE PADS, SOCCER SHIN PADS, JUMP ROPES, HAND GRIPS, CURL BARS WITH COLLARS, SIT-UP BARS, DUMBELLS, ANKLE AND WRIST WEIGHTS, EXERCISE SUIT, TENNIS RACKETS, RACQUETBALL RACQUETS, SHUTTLECOCKS, TENNIS WRISTBANDS, TENNIS HEADBANDS, REFEREE WHISTLES, DARTS, DARTBOARDS, ROSIN BAGS, EYEGLASS HOLDERS WITH ELASTIC, GLOVE LACING KITS AND DATTING TEE WITH BALL | ABANDONED | Feb 10, 1969 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 1987 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 26, 1987 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |