Drawing for BACHMANN

USPTO serial 73607639

BACHMANN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1509660Status 712
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 18, 1988
Examiner
FINE, STEVEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BACHMANN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN L. DUPRE

JOHN L DUPRE HAMILTON, BROOK, SMITH & REYNOLDSTWO MILITIA DRLEXINGTON, MA 02173UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006EXPANSION JOINTS, HANGERS AND SUPPORTSSECTION 37 - CANCELLEDDec 26, 1985
007DAMPERS FOR BLOCKING THE FLOW OF GASES FROM POWER PLANTS, SMELTERS, PAPER MILLS, CEMENT PLANTSSECTION 37 - CANCELLEDDec 26, 1985
020NON-METALLIC EXPANSION JOINTS, PIPE HANGERS AND SUPPORTSSECTION 37 - CANCELLEDDec 26, 1985

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 1, 1996C37.CANCELLED SECTION 37-TOTAL—
Oct 18, 1994815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Oct 18, 1988R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Jul 18, 1988CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Jun 24, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 24, 1988CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 21, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 16, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 15, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 1, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance