USPTO serial 73607866
TAPFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLE RICHARD G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TAPFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
H.H. ROBERTSON (AUSTRALIA) PTY. LIMITED
CHATSWOOD, NEW SOUTH WALES, GB
Other trademarks owned by H.H. ROBERTSON (AUSTRALIA) PTY. LIMITED
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL J. BERGER
MICHAEL J BERGER AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN90 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | FLOORING PANELS FOR USE IN BUILDINGS COMRISING MULTI-DUCT FLOORING SYSTEMS CONSISTING OF GRID MODULAR MEMBERS AND COVERING PANELS THEREFOR, SAID MEMBERS HAVING DUTS THEREIN FOR ELECTRICAL, TELEPHONE, DATA AND OTHER SERVICES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 1989 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |