USPTO serial 73608491
PEGASUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PEGASUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD P. BERG
RICHARD P BERG LADAS & PARRY3600 WILSHIRE BLVDLOS ANGELES, CA 90010UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | SHOES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SHENG CHUN CHEMICAL IND. CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by SHENG CHUN CHEMICAL IND. CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by WUCO TRADING CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named PEGASUS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 1990 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 13, 1990 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 12, 1989 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 21, 1988 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 16, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 21, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 19, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 31, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 23, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 21, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |