USPTO serial 73608555
CRACKLING GUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CRACKLING GUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
G. CHRISTYN ZAPPACOSTA
G CHRISTYN ZAPPACOSTA BENASUTTI AND MURRAYSTE 2701, THE ARA TWR ATONE READING CTR 11TH AND MARKET STSPHILADELPHIA, PA 19107Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | SWEETMEATS, STICKJAWS, SUGARDROPS, BISCUITS, STICK SWEETMEATS, CANDIES, CAKES, BONBONS, PASTRY AND CHEWING-GUMS PARTICULARLY BUBBLE GUM WITH MULTICOLORED POPPING CANDY | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 1988 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 10, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |