USPTO serial 73608620
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SUMMER HILL NSW, AU
SUMMER HILL NSW, AU
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SALLEY M. ABEL
SALLEY M ABEL C/O FENWICK, DAVIS & WTWO PALO ALTO SQ STE 800PALO ALTO, CA 94306UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND PROGRAM MANUALS ALL SOLD IN A UNIT | ABANDONED | Jan 5, 1986 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 1989 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 31, 1989 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 11, 1989 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 14, 1988 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 1, 1987 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 31, 1987 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 18, 1987 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 26, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 26, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |