USPTO serial 73609074
OVELAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OVELAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SETAGAYA-KU, TOKYO, JP
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | SKIN CARE PREPARATIONS AND COSMETICS, NAMELY CLEANSING OIL, SKIN LOTION, DAY SKIN CREAM, NIGHT SKIN CREAM, MASSAGE CREAM, FACE MASK, MAKEUP REMOVER, NAIL POLISH REMOVER, MAKEUP BASE; FACE POWDER; ROUGE; LIPSTICK; LIP ROUGE; EYESHADOW; EYELINER; LIPLINER; MASCARA; NAIL ENAMEL | ABANDONED | Jun 2, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 1988 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 19, 1988 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 19, 1988 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 3, 1988 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 1987 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 1987 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 10, 1987 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 18, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 5, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |