USPTO serial 73609224
KALA BRAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 7, 1989
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with KALA BRAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
WEST INDIES, TT
WEST INDIES, TT
CHAGUANAS, TT
WEST INDIES, TT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN CYRIL MALLOY III
JOHN CYRIL MALLOY III MALLOY & MALLOY P.L.2800 S.W. 3RD AVEMiami, FL 33129UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | SPICES, NAMELY, MEAT TENDERIZER, ONION SALT, GARLIC SALT, MONOSODIUM GLUTAMATE, CELERY SALT, PAPRIKA, CHILLI POWDER, CURRY POWDER, BLACK PEPPER, WHITE PEPPER, CINNAMON | ACTIVE | Mar 7, 1974 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CHIEF BRAND PRODUCTS LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by CHIEF BRAND PRODUCTS LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by C.B.P. LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by CHIEF BRAND PRODUCTS LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named KALA BRAND
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2019 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 20, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 20, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 7, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 12, 2010 | 9G8P | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | 8OKT | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 9 | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 28, 1996 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 6, 1995 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 1989 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 15, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 15, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 25, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 15, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 1989 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 1989 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 1988 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 1987 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 15, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |