USPTO serial 73612061
ORACORT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1771026Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 18, 1993
- Examiner
- HAMILTON, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ORACORT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BRAMALEA, ONTARIO, CA
BRAMALEA, ONTARIO, CA
BRAMALEA, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARCIA A. AUBERGER
MARCIA A AUBERGER VENABLE, LLPPO BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-9998UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATION CONTAINING TRIAMCINOLONE ACETONIDE FOR THE TREATMENT OF LESIONS AND INFLAMMATION OF GUMS | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2003 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| May 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 1999 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 17, 1999 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| May 18, 1993 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 23, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 22, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 6, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 23, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |