USPTO serial 73612062
CLOTRIMADERM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUSSMAN, RONALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CLOTRIMADERM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
DOWNSVIEW, ONTARIO, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | DERMATOLOGICAL ANTIFUNGAL PREPARATION CONTAINING CLOTRIMAZOLE | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 28, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |